After opening the month with a five percent market melt-up, investors were expecting a follow through this week that would take the averages higher. There was even talk of a possible break through the ceiling of this trading range that has lasted almost six months. Instead we only managed a couple point gain over last week’s close on the S&P 500.
That was despite some “good” economic news on the unemployment front. Initial unemployment claims were down by 27,000 and continuing claims fell 2,000, the best in two months. The bears argue that not all states submitted employment numbers so optimistic estimates were used instead, in some cases. They also point out that once a person’s unemployment runs out; they are no longer officially counted as unemployed. The advance guard of this group (those who were let go early in the recession and still have not found a job) exhausted their extended benefits beginning in June. Unfortunately, as time goes by, more and more unemployed Americans will fall into this category well into the middle of next year.
Over in euro land things were a bit dicier with increased concerns over European debt levels, problems with Anglo Irish Bank and the “news” that Europe’s bank stress test understated lender’s holdings of risky government debt. Readers may recall that I had grave reservations over this very same issue when the results were first announced weeks ago.
Most of the market’s attention has turned to the Obama Administration’s non- stimulus, stimulus plan. In my opinion,the source of last week’s rally was that some Wall Street players got an advanced look at what the administration’s thinking was. Now that we have the details, the markets seem to be decidedly unimpressed.
As readers recall, I explained that a good portion of the money from the first stimulus plan was deliberately held back until this summer in order to help the incumbent party get re-elected. That may have been a miscalculation on the part of the Democrats, who could have been overly confident of the economic impact of Stimulus One. To date, 77% of the $288 billion that was earmarked for tax benefits have been spent, only 53% of the $275 billion available for contracts, grants and loans has been distributed and only 64% of entitlements, or $144 billion out of $224 billion was doled out to the country. Obviously, those levels of spending weren’t enough to jump start the economy or reduce unemployment and people (voters) are angry.
The Obama Administration can read the polls as well as you or I. Since offense is always better than defense when running for re-election, the general consensus among Democrats is “we need more spending.” The president’s new initiatives could cost as much as $250-$300 billion or slightly less than half the first Stimulus plan. His agenda includes tax cuts for new business investments and R&D, $50 billion more spending on infrastructure and extending the Bush tax cuts for those Americans who make $200,000 or less ($250,000 if married).
It is not being called another stimulus plan because that might be seen as an admission that the first plan has failed. However on Friday, while addressing the nation on the economy and unemployment, the President did concede that “progress has been painfully slow.” Wall Street is already discounting the package as too little, too late and they may be right. They are putting the blame squarely on the President and his party. And this country loves to find a scapegoat.
In the meantime, the markets continue to vacillate on low volume. I’m still expecting stocks to move a bit higher into the 1,130 level on the S& P 500. Only then will there be another opportunity to break out of this trading range decisively and re-take the higher ground. If stocks do succeed in breaking out, I am prepared to change my mind about my 950 S & P target level. But I’m not holding my breath.